Thursday 3 May 2018

What was the Party's attitude towards controlling the Proles?

The Party has
an attitude of careless and contemptuous superiority towards the proles, 85% of the population
of Oceania (Part II, Chapter 9) and entirely dismisses any chance that they might successfully
rebel in the future. When re-educatingafter his arrest,is bluntly dismissive of Winston's hopes
in the proles:

The proletarians will never revolt, not in
a thousand years or a million. They cannot. I do not have to tell you the reason: you know it
already. If you have ever cherished any dreams of violent insurrection, you must abandon them.
There is no way in which the Party can be overthrown (Part III, Chapter 3).


As Syme, the Newspeak expert, stated at the beginning of the book,
the proles are "not human beings" (Part I, Chapter 5). Later on, Winston Smith
reflects on the Party's conviction of their insignificance:


...the Party taught that the proles were natural inferiors who must be kept in
subjection, like animals, by the application of a few simple rules. In reality very little was
known about the proles. It was not necessary to know much. So long as they continued to work and
breed, their other activities were without importance (Part I, Chapter 7).


They are by definition incapable of resistance, and thus not to be
feared.

This does not, however, mean that the Party leaves the proles
entirely to their own devices. As a group, they may not be dangerous, but the Thought Police
still keep a few agents among them, to start useful rumors and to eliminate any natural leaders
that may be born to them (Part I, Chapter 7). The proles are kept distracted by patriotic
displays, manipulated news, trash literature and pornography (Part II, Chapter 3), and a state
lottery (Part I, Chapter 8), so that they have less time to consider their position. They are
also maintained in a state of almost complete isolation from Party members and citizens of other
countries, so that they have nothing to compare their own situation with. If necessary, the
Party might even raid their ranks for talent, though at the time of the novel it is simpler to
just kill any proles who exhibit unusual abilities (Part II, Chapter 9).


Thus, the Party is completely sure it has the proles under permanant control, and that
they pose no danger whatsoever to continued Party dominance. Since a careful reading of the
Appendix on Newspeak indicates that the Party was in fact overthrown not long after the events
narrated in , it would seem that the casual contempt the Party entertained
for the proles had the usual effect of causing the fatal underestimation of a potential
rival.

No comments:

Post a Comment

In 1984, is Julia a spy? Please provide specific examples from the book. My teacher says that he knows of 17 pieces of evidence which proves that Julia...

There is some evidence to suggest thatwas a spy throughout 's classic novel . Julia portrays herself as a loyal admirer of Big ...