The belief
behind appeasement was done to avoid another calamity such as the First World War. Leaders such
as Chamberlain of England were convinced that the atrocities of the First World War should be
avoided at all costs. Reeling in from the chaos and undermining of faith, Europe was shattered
in geographic, financial, and emotional terms. All nations felt to a certain extent that the
paradigm with which they viewed the world at the start of the conflict was severely undermined
by it. The policy of appeasement struck at this very essence for it sought to avoid war at all
costs. If this meant dealing with terms articulated by Hitler at the time, it was seen as a
needed sacrifice. At the time, Hitler was not seen as the universal symbol of threatening evil
that he is seen as now. The belief was that containing him was an acceptable risk if it
prevented another entry into widened conflict. Bearing this in mind, it became nearly
impossible to stop him when all leaders realized the existential threat he posed. This would
mean that the policy of appeasement, a hope to avoid war, actually had much to do with a new one
starting.
Saturday, 23 December 2017
Why did the Western powers follow the policy of appeasement during the Second World War?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
In 1984, is Julia a spy? Please provide specific examples from the book. My teacher says that he knows of 17 pieces of evidence which proves that Julia...
There is some evidence to suggest thatwas a spy throughout 's classic novel . Julia portrays herself as a loyal admirer of Big ...
-
A central theme of "" is that of age: in this poem, we don't encounter the hero of The Iliad and The Odyssey . Rather...
-
Daryll Delgado's short story "Preludes" is full of ambiguities and uncertainties. Delgado deliberately leaves the read...
-
A native of the west, the speaker is well familiar with the climate and environment in his homeland when the west wind begins to blo...
No comments:
Post a Comment