The way you
have formed your question is a large part of the answer: we automatically ascribe a category
or taxonomy to his condition, placing him in a physiological family, called insecta, simply
because he appears to have an exoskeleton. This is Kafkas point: we humans think in terms of
some organized, conscious system designed by a Maker. But the novel is really a fictive
statement of the principles of existentialism (existence precedes essence) €“ we design
ourselves by our choices, by our conscious decisions and their consequences. Had Kafka chosen
another family €“ mammalia, for instance €“ his point would not be made as strongly, because we,
as mammals, would not perceive the metamorphosis as so symbolic.
Sunday, 16 August 2015
Why did Gregor Samsa turn into an insect of all things ?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
In 1984, is Julia a spy? Please provide specific examples from the book. My teacher says that he knows of 17 pieces of evidence which proves that Julia...
There is some evidence to suggest thatwas a spy throughout 's classic novel . Julia portrays herself as a loyal admirer of Big ...
-
This is an element of Dick's novel that suggests that Deckard is more machine than human: in the first paragraph, the "merr...
-
A central theme of "" is that of age: in this poem, we don't encounter the hero of The Iliad and The Odyssey . Rather...
-
Nicholas is a very smart young man who has planned out this day very carefully. He is dying to get into that lumber room. There is...
No comments:
Post a Comment