I think one of the joys
of this short story is that it defies interpretation. You need to note how the villagers are
often exposed as foolish and gullible in their beliefs, and also how they try to make sense of
the world. They stick fast to "facts" even though they are clearly ridiculous, such as
the fact that angels eat mothballs, and they jump to impossible conclusions, for example when
some argue that the old man should be proclaimed "mayor of the world." It is almost as
if once they have conceived of an idea they make reality "fit" to support that idea
despite any protestations to the contrary - or until a "better" version of the
"truth" comes along and then the process beings again. Of course, the villagers,
although they can be said to be figures of fun in this sense, contain many characteristics which
we can identify whatever our time or culture - for example the unquestioning belief in their own
wisdom and their stubborn clinging to their own ideas are aspects which we can all
identify.
It is clear though that while there are a few hints into this story
as to the "meaning" or "" there are no conclusive pointers that give one
definitive explanation. We are left, much like the villagers therefore, to try and make some
sort of meaning from these strange and bizarre events. The last laugh seems to be with Marquez,
however, as we prove ourselves to be like the villagers trying to make sense of this story and
coming up with very different and ridiculous answers. Therefore, if there is a
"meaning", it is that there is no "meaning" - it is more about the process
by which we make "meaning" and how we support our conclusions.
No comments:
Post a Comment